Back to Resources / Chicago Building Efficiency / 225 W. Wacker Drive
Market Insights / Chicago 2026
#1 in SpaceLogik’s downtown Chicago series

225 W. Wacker Drive
Less space.
Same requirements.

SpaceLogik’s Chicago series ranks 225 W. Wacker Drive #1 for space efficiency, with a projected requirement of 16,258 rentable square feet for the program used in the analysis.

Explore the building’s rating and the reported rent comparison below.

See the comparison
225 W. Wacker Drive
Image from SpaceLogik’s Chicago building efficiency series.
16,258Projected rentable square feet
910SpaceLogik® efficiency rating
18.2%Reported comparison savings
$10.92Reported savings per RSF/year at $60 rent

The space requirement behind the rent.

A property comparison should account for the amount of rentable space needed to accommodate your workplace program. The projected requirement at 225 W. Wacker Drive gives you another measure to consider alongside the quoted rent.

Series measureReported figure
Downtown Chicago ranking#1
Series comparison program20,000-RSF reference
Projected building requirement16,258 RSF
SpaceLogik efficiency rating910
Savings versus least-efficient properties18.2%
Illustrative annual rent assumption$60 per RSF
Reported rent savings$10.92 per RSF/year

Source figures retained from SpaceLogik’s supplied Chicago 2026 deck. Rent savings use the series comparison basis; they are not a quoted discount on this building’s asking rent. The $60 rent is an illustrative assumption.

Compare this building for your own workplace.

Your organization’s requirements determine the space you need. Use SpaceLogik’s patented space optimization tools to evaluate 225 W. Wacker Drive alongside other buildings using your own program, then compare total lease costs.

About this analysis

This spotlight belongs to SpaceLogik’s downtown Chicago 2026 series. Rankings and metrics describe the supplied analysis. Actual requirements and savings depend on your program, building and lease terms. Space efficiency concerns office space requirements and is separate from energy performance.

View the SpaceLogik LinkedIn post

Draft review notes — excluded from publication

The deck lists 16,258 RSF, which implies 18.71% against 20,000 RSF, while the reported savings are 18.2%. Confirm the projected RSF and comparison baseline. All figures are preserved from the deck rather than silently corrected. Confirm the series methodology before publication.

How much space would you need here?

Compare buildings using your workplace requirements and see how space efficiency affects your lease cost.

Compare Your Space Needs
Previous spotlight: #2Explore all ten buildings