Back to Resources / Chicago Building Efficiency / 1 N. Wacker Drive
Market Insights / Chicago 2026
#4 in SpaceLogik’s downtown Chicago series

1 N. Wacker Drive
Less space.
Same requirements.

SpaceLogik’s Chicago series ranks 1 N. Wacker Drive #4 for space efficiency, with a projected requirement of 17,640 rentable square feet for the program used in the analysis.

Explore the building’s rating and the reported rent comparison below.

See the comparison
1 N. Wacker Drive
Image from SpaceLogik’s Chicago building efficiency series.
17,640Projected rentable square feet
853SpaceLogik® efficiency rating
12.0%Reported comparison savings
$7.208Reported savings per RSF/year at $60 rent

The space requirement behind the rent.

A property comparison should account for the amount of rentable space needed to accommodate your workplace program. The projected requirement at 1 N. Wacker Drive gives you another measure to consider alongside the quoted rent.

Series measureReported figure
Downtown Chicago ranking#4
Series comparison program20,000-RSF reference
Projected building requirement17,640 RSF
SpaceLogik efficiency rating853
Savings versus least-efficient properties12.0%
Illustrative annual rent assumption$60 per RSF
Reported rent savings$7.208 per RSF/year

Source figures retained from SpaceLogik’s supplied Chicago 2026 deck. Rent savings use the series comparison basis; they are not a quoted discount on this building’s asking rent. The $60 rent is an illustrative assumption.

Compare this building for your own workplace.

Your organization’s requirements determine the space you need. Use SpaceLogik’s patented space optimization tools to evaluate 1 N. Wacker Drive alongside other buildings using your own program, then compare total lease costs.

About this analysis

This spotlight belongs to SpaceLogik’s downtown Chicago 2026 series. Rankings and metrics describe the supplied analysis. Actual requirements and savings depend on your program, building and lease terms. Space efficiency concerns office space requirements and is separate from energy performance.

View the SpaceLogik LinkedIn post

Draft review notes — excluded from publication

LinkedIn reports $7.08 per foot per year; the deck reports $7.208 and 12.0%. The listed 17,640 RSF implies 11.8% against a 20,000-RSF baseline. Confirm all three figures. All figures are preserved from the deck rather than silently corrected. Confirm the series methodology before publication.

How much space would you need here?

Compare buildings using your workplace requirements and see how space efficiency affects your lease cost.

Compare Your Space Needs
Previous spotlight: #5Explore all ten buildingsNext spotlight: #3